Memory drift
Six months in, nobody can say which facts are still true or where they came from.
Enterprise
Agent memory that stays inside your boundary.
A customer-controlled appliance for teams that cannot send agent state to a hosted service. Your infrastructure, your identity provider, no outbound calls.
Why teams call us
The failure mode is never “we could not store it”.
Unattributable state
Which run wrote this, was it verified, what did it replace? Most memory layers cannot answer.
Slow incident recovery
Without snapshots and diffs, recovery means hand-repairing records you first have to find.
Permission leakage
One shared surface means an agent can recall what the person in front of it should never see.
Controls
What the appliance actually gives you.
Runs in your boundary
A single-node Compose appliance you deploy yourself. Strict profiles make no outbound calls at all.
Your identity provider
Auth binds to your IdP and source ACLs, enforced before content is searchable and again before retrieval returns it.
Provenance on every write
Captured at write time, because it cannot be reconstructed afterwards.
Contradiction handling
Conflicting state is surfaced and revised, not silently overwritten.
Snapshot, diff, roll back
Snapshot before a risky run, inspect what changed, roll back what was wrong.
Offline licensing
Verified locally with asymmetric signatures. No license state ever destroys data or keys.
No wallet, no token, no gas fees.
Some agent-memory products settle storage through a token and ask your agent to hold a balance. Bilinc does not. An API key or your own IdP, and a normal invoice.
Platform teams carrying reliability or compliance weight.
Platform teams running multi-agent workflows whose state cannot leave the boundary. Usually a Head of AI Platform or the engineer who owns the AI infrastructure.
Pilot
Two weeks, one real workflow, a decision at the end.
Day 1–2
Baseline your current memory reliability and incident metrics, so the result is measurable against something.
Day 3–8
Integrate Bilinc into one real workflow — not a sandbox.
Day 9–12
Stress and failure testing, including the recovery path.
Day 13–14
Review against the success criteria agreed on day one, then a go / no-go decision.
Where this actually stands.
In pilot phase, onboarding design partners now. Not self-serve: your IdP, data boundary, ACL mapping, and recovery targets are rollout inputs, not assumptions we can make for you.
Pricing, SLA, and support scope are agreed in writing per engagement. If you need self-serve today, start with Bilinc Cloud.
Request a pilot.
Tell us your deployment target, data boundary, and security review timeline. You get back a scoped pilot plan and the success criteria we would hold ourselves to.